# Qwen-14B vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-14b-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen-14B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.7 to 27.8.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 41.5 |
| Rank | 273 | 123 |
| Context | — | 524K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)
- Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1072 | 1439 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)
- Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | 1398 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.8 | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |

## Math

- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)
- Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1068 | 1418 |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen-14B: —
- Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1421 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)
- Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1042 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)
- Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1376 |

## Long Context

- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)
- Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1029 | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)
- Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | 1391 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen-14B better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen-14B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Solar Pro4 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.