# Qwen-14B vs Qwen3 8B

> Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-14b-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen-14B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 8B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Qwen3 8B leads 37.9 to 31.3.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 33.7 |
| Rank | 275 | 238 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
- Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1071 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen-14B: —
- Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.03 | 136.17 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |

## Math

- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
- Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1068 | — |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen-14B: —
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1041 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
- Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1028 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen-14B better than Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen-14B or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Qwen3 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Qwen3 8B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.