# Qwen-14B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-14b-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen-14B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 64.5 to 27.8.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 273 | 66 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1072 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen-14B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | 1460 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.8 | 147.39 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |

## Math

- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1068 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen-14B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Qwen-14B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1281 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1042 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1439 |

## Long Context

- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1029 | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | 1459 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen-14B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen-14B or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.