# Qwen-14B vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-14b-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen-14B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 29.0 to 19.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 275 | 182 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1071 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.03 | 143.26 |
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |

## Math

- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1068 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen-14B: —
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1041 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1028 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen-14B better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.
