# Qwen-14B vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-14b-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen-14B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 49.4 to 27.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 275 | 181 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1071 | 1314 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | 1299 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.03 | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |

## Math

- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1068 | 1298 |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen-14B: —
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1041 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1028 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen-14B better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen-14B or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.