# Qwen-14B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-14b-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen-14B scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 48.8 to 27.8.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 273 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1072 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen-14B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.8 | 118.44 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |

## Math

- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1068 | — |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen-14B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 66.3% | 72.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1042 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1029 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen-14B better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen-14B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.