# Qwen-14B vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Qwen-14B and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen-14b-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen-14B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-72B leads 37.3 to 27.6.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen-14B | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 275 | 285 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1071 | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | 1148 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.03 | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |

## Math

- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1068 | 1164 |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen-14B: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1136 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1041 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | — | 1159 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1141 |

## Long Context

- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1028 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen-14B better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Qwen-14B and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Qwen-14B or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.2 vs 31.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Qwen1.5-72B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.