# Pixtral Large vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Pixtral Large has enough public results to be ranked (#257); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/pixtral-large-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 25.3 to 20.9.

## Snapshot

| | Pixtral Large | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 31.7 | 36.3 |
| Rank | 257 | — |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $6 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Pixtral Large: —
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Reasoning

- Pixtral Large: 20.9 (#208)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Pixtral Large: 30.0 (#105)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1089 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#273)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 988 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Pixtral Large better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Pixtral Large has enough public results to be ranked (#257); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Pixtral Large and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Pixtral Large has 3 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.