# Pixtral Large vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/pixtral-large-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Pixtral Large scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 64.3 to 32.9.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 259 | 72 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Pixtral Large: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Pixtral Large: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |

## Math

- Pixtral Large: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |

## Knowledge

- Pixtral Large: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |

## Multimodal

- Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1089 | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Pixtral Large: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Pixtral Large: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Pixtral Large: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1439 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 988 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Pixtral Large better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Pixtral Large and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Pixtral Large has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.