# Pixtral Large vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/pixtral-large-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 27.3 to 20.9.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.7 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 257 | 152 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $6 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Reasoning

- Pixtral Large: 20.9 (#208)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |

## Math

- Pixtral Large: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |

## Knowledge

- Pixtral Large: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |

## Multimodal

- Pixtral Large: 30.0 (#105)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1089 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#273)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Pixtral Large | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 988 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Pixtral Large better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Pixtral Large or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Pixtral Large and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Pixtral Large has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.