# Phi-4 vs Wizardlm 13b

> Phi-4 and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.9 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-4-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi-4 scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Phi-4 leads 37.4 to 27.3.

## Snapshot

| | Phi-4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 269 | 272 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.07 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi-4: 33.8 (#237)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1231 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 30.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Phi-4: 22.6 (#120)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.8% | — |
| BALROG | 11.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Phi-4: 17.0 (#287)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1018 |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 47.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 45.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.43 | — |
| LiveBench | 41.6% | — |

## Math

- Phi-4: 19.6 (#279)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1246 | 1017 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 13.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 42% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 64.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Phi-4: 32.5 (#204)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| Confabulations | 29.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1203 | — |
| MMLU | 84.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi-4: 37.4 (#232)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1197 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1211 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1223 | — |
| LMArena German | 1222 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1151 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1234 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi-4: 60.6 (#246)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | 1049 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Phi-4: 36.9 (#221)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1217 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi-4: 40.7 (#239)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1217 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1182 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1206 | 1047 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 62.6% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi-4 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Phi-4 and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.9 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Phi-4 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Phi-4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi-4 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.