# Phi-4 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-4-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 36.1 to 20.8.
- Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Phi-4 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 279 | 181 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.07 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1231 | 1314 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 30.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.8% | — |
| BALROG | 11.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1299 |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 47.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 45.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.42 | — |
| LiveBench | 41.6% | — |

## Math

- Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1246 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 13.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 42% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 64.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1203 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| Confabulations | 29.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.7% | — |
| MMLU | 84.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1197 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1212 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1222 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1158 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1209 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1151 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1234 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1217 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1217 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1182 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1206 | 1299 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 62.6% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi-4 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi-4 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi-4 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.