# Phi-4 vs Qwen-14B

> Phi-4 and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.2 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-4-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi-4 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen-14B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Phi-4 leads 40.5 to 27.6.

## Snapshot

| | Phi-4 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 279 | 275 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.07 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1231 | 1071 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 30.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.8% | — |
| BALROG | 11.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)
- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1027 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.42 | 113.03 |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 47.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 45.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| LiveBench | 41.6% | — |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1246 | 1068 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 13.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 42% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 64.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 84.8% | 66.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| Confabulations | 29.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1203 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |

## Multilingual

- Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)
- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1197 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1212 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1224 | — |
| LMArena German | 1222 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1151 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1234 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)
- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | 1031 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1217 | 1028 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)
- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1217 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1182 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1206 | 1022 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 62.6% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi-4 better than Qwen-14B?

Phi-4 and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.2 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Phi-4 or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Phi-4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi-4 and Qwen-14B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.