# Phi-4 Mini vs Qwen3-1.7B

> Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-4-mini-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi-4 Mini leads 25.3 to 19.6.

## Snapshot

| | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 26.6 |
| Rank | 283 | 336 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.075 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 10.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Phi-4 Mini: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |

## Reasoning

- Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |

## Math

- Phi-4 Mini: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |

## Knowledge

- Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi-4 Mini better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.