# Phi-4 Mini vs Qwen1.5-14B

> Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-4-mini-vs-qwen1-5-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen1.5-14B leads 33.1 to 28.1.

## Snapshot

| | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 283 | 253 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.075 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 10.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1138 |

## Reasoning

- Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |

## Math

- Phi-4 Mini: —
- Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1125 |

## Knowledge

- Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |

## Multilingual

- Phi-4 Mini: —
- Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1147 |
| LMArena French | — | 1116 |
| LMArena German | — | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1085 |

## Instruction Following

- Phi-4 Mini: —
- Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1102 |

## Long Context

- Phi-4 Mini: —
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1113 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi-4 Mini: —
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1110 |

## FAQ

### Is Phi-4 Mini better than Qwen1.5-14B?

Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi-4 Mini or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.1 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Qwen1.5-14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.