# Phi-4 Mini vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-4-mini-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 30.7 to 24.8.

## Snapshot

| | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 33.6 |
| Rank | 280 | 231 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.075 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi-4 Mini: 27.6 (#312)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 10.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |

## Reasoning

- Phi-4 Mini: 21.7 (#190)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |

## Math

- Phi-4 Mini: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |

## Knowledge

- Phi-4 Mini: 24.8 (#261)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |

## Multilingual

- Phi-4 Mini: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1150 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1141 |

## Instruction Following

- Phi-4 Mini: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1158 |

## Long Context

- Phi-4 Mini: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi-4 Mini: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)

| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Phi-4 Mini better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi-4 Mini or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Qwen1.5-110B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.