# Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-small-8k-instruct-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 37.0 to 25.4.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 310 | 222 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1102 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1100 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 30.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |
| HellaSwag | 77% | — |
| LiveBench | 24% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 17.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1151 | — |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1067 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 90.7% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 58.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena French | 1134 | — |
| LMArena German | 1080 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 966 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 894 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1087 | — |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1088 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1068 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 12.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen3 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.