# Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.8 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-small-8k-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads 38.1 to 27.4.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 310 | 291 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1102 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1100 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 30.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
| HellaSwag | 77% | — |
| LiveBench | 24% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 17.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1151 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1067 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 90.7% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 58.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena French | 1134 | — |
| LMArena German | 1080 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 966 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 894 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1087 | — |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1088 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1068 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 12.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.8 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.