# Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

> Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#310); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-small-8k-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-14b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.1 to 27.4.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 38.2 |
| Rank | 310 | — |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.1 (#187)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1102 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.2% |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1100 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 30.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77% | — |
| LiveBench | 24% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 17.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1151 | — |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 75.7% | 79.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1067 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 90.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 58.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena French | 1134 | — |
| LMArena German | 1080 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 966 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 894 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1087 | — |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1088 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1068 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 12.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#310); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.