# Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Qwen1.5-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-small-8k-instruct-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen1.5-72B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 28.5 to 11.5.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 310 | 282 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1102 | 1166 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1100 | 1148 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 30.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77% | — |
| LiveBench | 24% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1151 | 1164 |
| LiveBench Math | 17.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1067 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 90.7% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 58.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1134 | 1158 |
| LMArena German | 1080 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 966 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 894 | 1049 |
| LMArena Russian | 1111 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1087 | 1142 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 47.2% | — |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1088 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1068 | 1160 |
| LiveBench Language | 12.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Qwen1.5-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-72B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.