# Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Qwen1.5-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-small-8k-instruct-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen1.5-32B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 28.5 to 13.5.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 310 | 288 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1102 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1100 | 1131 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 30.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77% | — |
| LiveBench | 24% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1151 | 1155 |
| LiveBench Math | 17.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1067 | 1126 |
| MMLU | 75.7% | 74.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 90.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 58.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1134 | 1100 |
| LMArena German | 1080 | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | 966 | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | 894 | 1007 |
| LMArena Russian | 1111 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1087 | 1116 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 47.2% | — |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1088 | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1068 | 1140 |
| LiveBench Language | 12.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Qwen1.5-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.1 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.