# Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-small-8k-instruct-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 31.1.
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 314 | 210 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1101 | 1328 |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1100 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.9% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 30.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77% | — |
| LiveBench | 24% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1151 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 17.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1067 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 90.7% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 58.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 966 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1111 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1135 | — |
| LMArena German | 1080 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 894 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1087 | 1303 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 47.2% | — |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1088 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1068 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Language | 12.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen Plus share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.