# Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen-14B

> Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-small-8k-instruct-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen-14B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen-14B leads 18.7 to 14.2.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 310 | 273 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1102 | 1072 |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1100 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.1% | 55% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 30.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.8 |
| HellaSwag | 77% | — |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| LiveBench | 24% | — |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1151 | 1068 |
| LiveBench Math | 17.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 90.7% | 84.4% |
| MMLU | 75.7% | 66.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1067 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 58.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1134 | — |
| LMArena German | 1080 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 966 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 894 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1087 | 1031 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 47.2% | — |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1088 | 1029 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1068 | 1022 |
| LiveBench Language | 12.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen-14B?

Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Qwen-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.6 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen-14B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.