# Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct vs Wizardlm 13b

> Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-mini-4k-instruct-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Wizardlm 13b leads 53.7 to 48.0.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 27.4 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 324 | 272 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.1 (#319)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1093 | 1035 |
| LiveBench Coding | 15.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 59.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 13.6 (#326)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1072 | 1018 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 26.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34.7% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 52.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 71.7% | — |
| HellaSwag | 76.7% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 70.8% | — |

## Math

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 24.5 (#258)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1111 | 1017 |
| LiveBench Math | 15.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.9 (#241)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1045 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.9% | — |
| MMLU | 68.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 64% | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.5 (#275)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1021 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1021 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1075 | — |
| LMArena German | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 935 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 905 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1084 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 48.0 (#298)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1053 | 1049 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 39.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#271)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1044 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.7 (#295)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1073 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1037 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1018 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Language | 9.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better than Wizardlm 13b?

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.