# Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-mini-4k-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads 38.1 to 26.1.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.4 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 324 | 291 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.1 (#319)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LiveBench Coding | 15.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1093 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 59.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 13.6 (#326)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 26.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1072 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34.7% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 52.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 71.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
| HellaSwag | 76.7% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 70.8% | — |

## Math

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 24.5 (#258)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 15.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1111 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.9 (#241)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1045 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.9% | — |
| MMLU | 68.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 64% | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.5 (#275)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1021 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1021 | — |
| LMArena French | 1075 | — |
| LMArena German | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 935 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 905 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1084 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 48.0 (#298)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 39.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1053 | — |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#271)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1044 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.7 (#295)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1037 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1018 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 9.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.
