# Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-mini-128k-instruct-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Trinity Large Thinking in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 53.8 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 305 | 185 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1039 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1028 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1089 | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 984 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1016 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1039 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1006 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 899 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 856 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1004 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1059 | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1023 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 996 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1050 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 989 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Trinity Large Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Trinity Large Thinking share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.