# Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-mini-128k-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 49.4 to 27.1.
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 305 | 181 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1039 | 1314 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1028 | 1299 |

## Math

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1089 | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 984 | 1289 |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1016 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1006 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 899 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1004 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1039 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 856 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1059 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1023 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 996 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1050 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 989 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.