# Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen3.6 27B

> Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-medium-4k-instruct-vs-qwen3-6-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 29.6.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 41.9 |
| Rank | 246 | 112 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $3.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 38.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1130 | — |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 24.4 (#148)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1127 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.47 |

## Math

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 47.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1173 | — |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#58)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1108 | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1094 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1108 | — |
| LMArena French | 1109 | — |
| LMArena German | 1101 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1042 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 954 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1095 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1120 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#180)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1106 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3.6 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.