# Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-medium-4k-instruct-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 14B leads 39.2 to 29.6.

## Snapshot

| | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 246 | 222 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1130 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1127 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |

## Math

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1173 | — |

## Knowledge

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1108 | — |

## Multilingual

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1094 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1108 | — |
| LMArena French | 1109 | — |
| LMArena German | 1101 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1042 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 954 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1095 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |

## Long Context

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1120 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1106 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen3 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.