# phi-3-medium 14B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-medium-14b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 36.8 to 30.1.

## Snapshot

| | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 306 | 274 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.23 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |

## Instruction Following

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1048 |

## Long Context

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is phi-3-medium 14B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Wizardlm 13b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.