# phi-3-medium 14B vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

> Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-medium-14b-vs-tulu-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. phi-3-medium 14B scores higher in 2 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 25.1 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 17.6% for phi-3-medium 14B and 42.7% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.

## Snapshot

| | phi-3-medium 14B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 32.6 |
| Rank | 306 | 242 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1236 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1220 |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.18 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | 42.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1242 |

## Knowledge

- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | 46.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1246 |

## Instruction Following

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1233 |

## Long Context

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1224 |

## Writing & Preference

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is phi-3-medium 14B or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.3 vs 35.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.