# phi-3-medium 14B vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-medium-14b-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 41.1 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 44.7 |
| Rank | 306 | 72 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1488 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.18 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1473 |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1483 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1467 |

## Long Context

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1477 |

## Writing & Preference

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1478 |

## FAQ

### Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is phi-3-medium 14B or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.