# phi-3-medium 14B vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

> Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-medium-14b-vs-qwen3-5-35b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. phi-3-medium 14B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 47.8 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B and 83.5% for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.

## Snapshot

| | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 42.0 |
| Rank | 306 | 123 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1254 |
| SciCode | — | 29.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1410 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.23 | 142.52 |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1400 |
| DTBench | — | 80% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 70% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1404 |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | 83.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1408 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1376 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1392 |

## Instruction Following

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1379 |

## Long Context

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1389 |

## Writing & Preference

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1390 |

## FAQ

### Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is phi-3-medium 14B or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.