# phi-3-medium 14B vs Qwen3.5 27B

> Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-medium-14b-vs-qwen3-5-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 27B leads 37.4 to 9.1.

## Snapshot

| | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 41.4 |
| Rank | 306 | 127 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.6 (#159)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1357 |
| WeirdML | — | 39.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1427 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 349.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: —

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 201.98 |

## Reasoning

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 26.6 (#116)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 47.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1414 |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LMCA | — | 34% |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.18 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 36.8 (#103)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56.7% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1428 |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 37.4 (#149)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1428 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.7 (#56)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1240 |

## Multilingual

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 51.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1409 |
| LMArena German | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1345 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 73.7 (#114)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1393 |

## Long Context

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 43.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1413 |

## Writing & Preference

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 59.5 (#106)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1410 |

## FAQ

### Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Qwen3.5 27B?

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is phi-3-medium 14B or Qwen3.5 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen3.5 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 27B has 28.