# phi-3-medium 14B vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

> phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen1.5 4b Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 28.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-medium-14b-vs-qwen1-5-4b-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads 26.2 to 9.1.

## Snapshot

| | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 28.3 |
| Rank | 306 | 319 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 28.6 (#305)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 999 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 17.7 (#277)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 976 |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.18 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 27.9 (#233)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1026 |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.2 (#252)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 980 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.2 (#285)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1024 |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 952 |

## Instruction Following

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.3 (#295)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 979 |

## Long Context

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#285)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 988 |

## Writing & Preference

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.9 (#304)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 977 |

## FAQ

### Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen1.5 4b Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 28.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is phi-3-medium 14B or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.