# phi-3-medium 14B vs Qwen Max

> Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-medium-14b-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. phi-3-medium 14B scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Max in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Max leads 30.3 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 17.6% for phi-3-medium 14B and 67.2% for Qwen Max.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 34.4 |
| Rank | 306 | 226 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1288 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1270 |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.18 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |

## Math

- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | 67.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1329 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1262 |

## Long Context

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1289 |

## Writing & Preference

- phi-3-medium 14B: —
- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is phi-3-medium 14B or Qwen Max better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen Max share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.