# Phi-3.5-MoE vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#291); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-5-moe-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 29.7 |
| Rank | — | 291 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi-3.5-MoE: —
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |

## Reasoning

- Phi-3.5-MoE: —
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
| PIQA | 88.6% | — |

## Math

- Phi-3.5-MoE: —
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
| GSM8K | 88.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Phi-3.5-MoE: —
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| BoolQ | 84.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi-3.5-MoE better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#291); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-MoE and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-MoE has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.