# Phi-3.5-mini vs Qwen1.5-7B

> Qwen1.5-7B has enough public results to be ranked (#270); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-3-5-mini-vs-qwen1-5-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 30.8 |
| Rank | — | 270 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271)

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1107 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 38.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Phi-3.5-mini: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237)

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1066 |
| PIQA | 81% | — |

## Math

- Phi-3.5-mini: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222)

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1080 |
| GSM8K | 86.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Phi-3.5-mini: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239)

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| BoolQ | 78% | — |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |

## Multilingual

- Phi-3.5-mini: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266)

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |

## Instruction Following

- Phi-3.5-mini: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276)

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1058 |

## Long Context

- Phi-3.5-mini: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261)

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1090 |

## Writing & Preference

- Phi-3.5-mini: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288)

| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1061 |

## FAQ

### Is Phi-3.5-mini better than Qwen1.5-7B?

Qwen1.5-7B has enough public results to be ranked (#270); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Phi-3.5-mini or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-mini and Qwen1.5-7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-mini has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.