# Phi-2 vs Qwen Turbo

> Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#335); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-2-vs-qwen-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Phi-2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Phi-2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 27.1 |
| Rank | — | 335 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Phi-2: —
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 45.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Phi-2: —
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Adversarial NLI | 42.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 59.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 107.94 | — |
| HellaSwag | 53.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 54.7% | — |

## Math

- Phi-2: —
- Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |

## Knowledge

- Phi-2: —
- Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)

| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 75.9% | — |
| MMLU | 58.4% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 73.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 45.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi-2 better than Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#335); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Phi-2 and Qwen Turbo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-2 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.