# Phi-1.5 vs Qwen3-1.7B

> Qwen3-1.7B has enough public results to be ranked (#331); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-1-5-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Phi-1.5 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 26.2 |
| Rank | — | 331 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Phi-1.5: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108)

| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |

## Reasoning

- Phi-1.5: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 90.82 | — |
| HellaSwag | 47.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73.4% | — |

## Math

- Phi-1.5: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288)

| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |

## Knowledge

- Phi-1.5: —
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273)

| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 44.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 75.8% | — |
| MMLU | 37.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 37.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi-1.5 better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Qwen3-1.7B has enough public results to be ranked (#331); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Phi-1.5 and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-1.5 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.