# Phi-1.5 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

> Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#302); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-1-5-vs-qwen2-5-vl-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Phi-1.5 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 29.9 |
| Rank | — | 302 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Output $/M | — | $8.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Phi-1.5: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Phi-1.5: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)

| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 91.53 | — |
| HellaSwag | 47.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Phi-1.5: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 44.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 75.8% | — |
| MMLU | 37.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 37.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Phi-1.5: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)

| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Phi-1.5 better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#302); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Phi-1.5 and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-1.5 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.