# Phi-1.5 vs Qwen Turbo

> Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#329); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/phi-1-5-vs-qwen-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Phi-1.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Phi-1.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 26.8 |
| Rank | — | 329 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Reasoning

- Phi-1.5: —
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 90.82 | — |
| HellaSwag | 47.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73.4% | — |

## Math

- Phi-1.5: —
- Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)

| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |

## Knowledge

- Phi-1.5: —
- Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 44.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 75.8% | — |
| MMLU | 37.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 37.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Phi-1.5 better than Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#329); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Phi-1.5 and Qwen Turbo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-1.5 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.