# Palm 2 vs Qwen3.8 27B

> Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/palm-2-vs-qwen3-8-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 65.9 to 25.7.
- Qwen3.8 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Palm 2 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 296 | 64 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.99 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.49 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 50.3 (#42)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 995 | 1487 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1592 |
| SciCode | — | 46.6% |

## Reasoning

- Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 31.5 (#71)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1459 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 54.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| DTBench | — | 88% |
| LMCA | — | 41.4% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.38 |

## Math

- Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 35.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1453 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |

## Knowledge

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 40.9 (#105)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1482 |

## Multimodal

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen3.8 27B: 40.5 (#36)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1270 |

## Multilingual

- Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 54.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1431 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1504 |
| LMArena French | — | 1468 |
| LMArena German | — | 1435 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1444 |

## Instruction Following

- Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1436 |

## Long Context

- Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#66)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1448 |

## Writing & Preference

- Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)
- Qwen3.8 27B: 65.9 (#41)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1382 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1443 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1671 |

## FAQ

### Is Palm 2 better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Palm 2 or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen3.8 27B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 28.