# Palm 2 vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

> Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/palm-2-vs-qwen3-5-35b-a3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 57.9 to 25.6.
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 42.0 |
| Rank | 298 | 123 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $2 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 994 | 1410 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1254 |
| SciCode | — | 29.3% |

## Reasoning

- Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1400 |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| DTBench | — | 80% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.52 |

## Math

- Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1404 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 70% |

## Knowledge

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1408 |

## Multilingual

- Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1376 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1392 |

## Instruction Following

- Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1379 |

## Long Context

- Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1389 |

## Writing & Preference

- Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1395 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1346 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1390 |

## FAQ

### Is Palm 2 better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Palm 2 or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.