# Palm 2 vs Qwen3.5 27B

> Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/palm-2-vs-qwen3-5-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 27B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 27B leads 59.5 to 25.7.
- Qwen3.5 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 41.4 |
| Rank | 296 | 127 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.6 (#159)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 995 | 1427 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1357 |
| WeirdML | — | 39.5% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 349.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: —

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 201.98 |

## Reasoning

- Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 26.6 (#116)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1414 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 47.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LMCA | — | 34% |

## Math

- Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 36.8 (#103)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1428 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56.7% |

## Knowledge

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 37.4 (#149)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1428 |

## Multimodal

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen3.5 27B: 38.7 (#56)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1240 |

## Multilingual

- Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 51.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1390 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1409 |
| LMArena German | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1345 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 73.7 (#114)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1393 |

## Long Context

- Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 43.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1413 |

## Writing & Preference

- Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)
- Qwen3.5 27B: 59.5 (#106)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1409 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1410 |

## FAQ

### Is Palm 2 better than Qwen3.5 27B?

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Palm 2 or Qwen3.5 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen3.5 27B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 27B has 28.