# Palm 2 vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/palm-2-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 37.0 to 28.4.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Palm 2 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 296 | 222 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 995 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |

## Math

- Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1049 | — |

## Knowledge

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |

## Multilingual

- Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | — |

## Long Context

- Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Palm 2 better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Palm 2 or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen3 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.