# Palm 2 vs Qwen2-72B

> Palm 2 and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/palm-2-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2-72B in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2-72B leads 40.8 to 25.6.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Palm 2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 298 | 300 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
- Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 994 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
- Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.28 |

## Math

- Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
- Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |

## Knowledge

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |

## Multilingual

- Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
- Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | — | 1170 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1169 |

## Instruction Following

- Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
- Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1181 |

## Long Context

- Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1192 |

## Writing & Preference

- Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
- Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1196 |

## FAQ

### Is Palm 2 better than Qwen2-72B?

Palm 2 and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Palm 2 or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.0 vs 29.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen2-72B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.