# Palm 2 vs Qwen2.5-Max

> Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/palm-2-vs-qwen2-5-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 55.4 to 25.6.

## Snapshot

| | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 40.7 |
| Rank | 298 | 146 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 994 | 1359 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |

## Reasoning

- Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1360 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.53 |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |

## Math

- Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1369 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |

## Knowledge

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |

## Multilingual

- Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1382 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |

## Instruction Following

- Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |

## Long Context

- Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Palm 2 better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Palm 2 or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen2.5-Max share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.