# Palm 2 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

> Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/palm-2-vs-qwen2-5-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads 46.9 to 25.7.
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 296 | 259 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $5.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32.8 (#256)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 995 | 1293 |
| WeirdML | — | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.9% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.0 (#124)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 5.7% |
| BALROG | — | 16.2% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |

## Reasoning

- Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 21.4 (#197)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1271 |
| DTBench | — | 62.9% |
| LMCA | — | 13.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129.01 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| HellaSwag | — | 84.8% |
| PIQA | — | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 82.3% |

## Math

- Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 18.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1283 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 33% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.2% |

## Knowledge

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 26.9 (#247)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 19.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1245 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 94.5% |
| MMLU | — | 85.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |

## Multilingual

- Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.2 (#208)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1272 |
| LMArena French | — | 1279 |
| LMArena German | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1180 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1255 |

## Instruction Following

- Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1254 |
| IFEval | — | 80.6% |

## Long Context

- Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#183)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1282 |

## Writing & Preference

- Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1221 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1272 |
| WildBench | — | 80.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Palm 2 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Palm 2 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.8 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.