# Palm 2 vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Palm 2 and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/palm-2-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen1.5-32B leads 31.6 to 21.1.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 296 | 288 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 995 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Reasoning

- Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1131 |

## Math

- Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1155 |

## Knowledge

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multilingual

- Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | — | 1100 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1007 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Palm 2 better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Palm 2 and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Palm 2 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.1 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen1.5-32B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.